More Preseason College Basketball Rankings: Pitt Draws Attention

With the AP rankings recently released, the two main polls are both out and Pitt ranks No. 10 and No. 11 in the AP and ESPN/USA Today polls respectively. But the Panthers are also getting respect in a couple of other preseason rankings and are rated even higher in one.

Rivals.com is one such outlet, ranking Pitt at No. 9 in their top 32 poll. They're also one of the many to wonder when Pitt will finally break through to a Final Four:

Jamie Dixon has built the Panthers into the Big East's most consistent program; soon, this will be one of the most consistent programs in the ACC. Pitt has reached 10 consecutive NCAA tournaments, the longest such streak in the Big East. Yet Pitt has yet to claim the biggest prize: a Final Four appearance. In Pitt's decade of tournament appearances, five Big East programs have reached the Final Four (or seven, if you count Louisville and Marquette reaching the national semifinals as Conference USA programs).

The Sporting News checks Pitt in at No. 11 and somehow finds a reason to think that Ashton Gibbs is a reason to worry:

Although Gibbs starts at point guard, he is not really a creator. He can’t blow by defenders and get into the lane. That never was a problem as long as Brad Wanamaker, a natural at setting up teammates who easily led the Panthers in assists, was in the lineup. Who assumes that role is the biggest question the team faces. Pitt wasn’t an offensive machine last year, averaging 74 points per game, but Wanamaker’s playmaking helped the Panthers to shoot a respectable 47.5 percent from the field. Past Pitt teams always have excelled at making the extra pass, but that might be less of an option with a less experienced team.

Huh? Let's take a look at this...
This is borderline insanity and we're all dumber for having heard this. Seriously, we all know Gibbs isn't a Chris Paul-type of player, but a reason to worry? Please. For starters, Gibbs will share those point guard duties with Travon Woodall and him playing the point is far from a big problem. I've said plenty of times that I prefer Gibbs at shooting guard, but I wouldn't call it a big reason to worry if he ends up at the point.

Further, Gibbs playing point guard has nothing to do with the team being unable to make the extra pass. This team has never been built on great shooting, it's more about making passes to take good shots. So the fact that the team is younger shouldn't change that - if anything, it should reinforce it because without great shooters, the team should constantly be looking to make the extra pass. I don't see that changing regardless of where Gibbs plays.
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Cardiac Hill

You must be a member of Cardiac Hill to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Cardiac Hill. You should read them.

Join Cardiac Hill

You must be a member of Cardiac Hill to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Cardiac Hill. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker