Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Week 2 EPL Coverage
Sprint-network-bar2 01

Pitt Basketball: Ever The Pessimist

I don't know, I guess I just can't help it. Actually, I wouldn't call myself pessimistic so much as trying to temper any enthusiasm about Pitt winning a couple of games missing some players.

And when I read Wednesday's Post-Gazette piece, I couldn't help but feel that way even more.

Star-divide

Zeise's column talks about Pitt essentially doing more despite the recent absences of Ashton Gibbs, Dante Taylor, and Lamar Patterson.

Yes, Pitt won both of those games (and, yes, I half-expected Pitt to lose the WVU game), but let's take a look at things a little closer.

Cincinnati is perhaps the definition of mediocre. Playing at home, Pitt should win that game, regardless of the fact that they were missing two bench players. In all reality, Cincinnati has no true wins of great significance and has only three that can reasonably be considered solid wins - blowouts of 17-6 Xavier and 17-7 Dayton teams at home, and a two-point win on the road at St. John's.

West Virginia is a good team and in my opinion, significantly better than Cincinnati. but after seeing the way Pitt played in the first half of that game, I'd hardly call that taking their game to the next level.

Further, while West Virginia is certainly a good team, let's not lose our heads. True the game was on the road, but the Mountaineers have had a tumultuous season, losing several players. They're down to eight scholarship players and the team's best player is just now getting back from a suspension. Further, while the Mountaineers have gotten some quality wins this season (Georgetown and Purdue), they've also lost eight games this year to teams including Marshall, Miami, St. John's, Marquette and Minnesota. Other than Marshall, I wouldn't call those teams bad, but it's a little telling that WVU lost to all of them.

The point is that Cincinnati and West Virginia aren't world beaters. It's nice that Pitt won both of those games, but I wouldn't say that Pitt doesn't miss a beat when they're missing players.

Now, if the Panthers can beat Villanova on the road without Gibbs, that's another thing entirely.

Panthers Fan Confidence Poll

Last tallied on 02/09.

Tweet Comment 2 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

They obviously miss Gibbs, but winning on the road in the big east, especially west virginia was pretty impressive without gibbs. Nova will be much harder to beat without gibbs’ scoring ability though. However, I love how much woodall has improved his shot from last year to this year. It has already helped to ease the loss of gibbs.

by PhilsForever on Feb 10, 2026 7:52 PM EST reply actions  

Grinding out a win in a tough environment will only help us in March. Nova always scares me, they seem to always play above their norm (like Notre Dame) against us.

HTP

by Jaranosh on Feb 10, 2026 8:32 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Pittsburgh Panthers.

Latest NCAAF Headlines From SB Nation

Cowboy Altitude
16 Weeks Till Wyoming At Colorado State
Arkansas Expats
The AP Says The Hogs Are No. 15
Shakin The Southland
Car Flag / Magnet Rules
California Golden Blogs
Cal Men's Basketball Beats Danes, 81-73
Alligator Army
Florida Soccer Opens Gators' 2011 Athletic Schedule With 2-0 Win Over Miami

More Latest NCAAF Headlines From SB Nation »

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Better "QB Running Over Defender" Play??
254060_10100163207158483_14220438_48083334_6629791_n_small
EJ Banks transfers to Pitt; Sacco leaves the team
Wvu_small
A question from a Mountaineer fan...
Small
Pitt's Big East Basketball Home And Away Opponents
Small
Why Two Years of Pitt-Penn State is Enough

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Anson_1_small CardiacHill

Contributors

Small mikeo90

Small oaklandzoo12