What We Know About Pitt's Football Schedule - 2012 And Beyond
Another day has passed and still we know nothing of Pitt's football schedule for next season. About the only things known right now are that Pitt will likely be in the Big East (unfortunately) and there are currently four non-conference games - two home against Youngstown State and Virginia Tech and two on the road against Buffalo and Notre Dame. We also know that Pitt will likely have six or seven conference games depending on whether or not a school like Boise State can join the Big East for 2012.
Steve Pederson has said that Pitt is close to finalizing a non-conference game for next season to replace the TCU game and I think expect an FCS team.
The scheduling quirk for Pitt next season is that they are scheduled to face only two Big East teams at home. As things stand now, Pitt is scheduled to face Rutgers and Louisville at home and travel to Syracuse, South Florida, Cincinnati, and Connecticut. Should the conference not get a school to come in for 2012, it will be interesting to see if t the schedule is adjusted so each school plays three at home and three on the road.
Assuming all that happens and Boise State doesn't join for 2012, Pitt finds itself without a 6th non-conference game. The Panthers would have six home games in that scenario, so another game at Heinz Field isn't mandatory. But they may want a 7th as Pitt would likely want another one to offset revenue losses from playing two FCS opponents.
Sean Keeley over at Syracuse blog Troy Nunes is an Absolute Magician found a list of schools looking to fill their non-conference schedules. They include:Arkansas, Florida State, Hawaii, Houston, Middle Tennessee State, Missouri, Nebraska, North Texas, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas A&M, UAB, Louisiana-Lafayette, and UTEP
There appear to be some good opportunities for 2012. But the problem is not so much with this year - it's with upcoming seasons. Pitt is booked until the 2016 season.
2013: Villanova, NC State*, @ Virginia Tech*, @ Navy, Notre Dame
2014: Delaware, @ FIU, Iowa, Akron, @ Notre Dame
2015: @ Akron, @ Iowa, Notre Dame
2016: Penn State, @ Notre Dame, ?
2017: @ Penn State, ?, ?
*slated to become conference games should Pitt move to the ACC in 2013
As you can see, the Panthers will need to trim some of these opponents if the team is able to leave for the ACC early. 2016 is a while away, but particularly interesting.The school has tried to get Penn State on the schedule for years, so it's hard to see them ditching that game. They've also made Notre Dame a clear priority. So will Pitt try to keep both or will they go the route of trying to find reschedule one in order to get an easier opponent?
The other thing is that in looking at the schedule, it doesn't offer much in the way of potential home-and-homes, which Pitt would need to offer if they were to play a school like Arkansas or Nebraska next season. If they were, the return trip couldn't be until 2017 at the earliest.
In the end, where does that leave Pitt for a 6th non-conference game for 2012? Playing a home game against a team like North Texas, UAB, or Middle Tennessee State is very possible.
And you thought the home slate couldn't get any worse for next season...
Be sure to join Cardiac Hill's Facebook page and follow us on Twitter @PittPantherBlog for our regular updates on Pitt football and basketball.
Panthers Fan Confidence Poll
Last tallied on 02/15.
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Pitt to ACC in 2012?
Can I ask your take on my theory about what is happening with Pitt in the Big East… I think what was happening was that Pitt planned on using the 2nd hole in their schedule being created by WVU leaving as reason to say that if they were made to stay in the Big East, then they would be caused irreparable harm brought about by mismanagement on the part of conference officials… I think they planned on using that as their out and would have likely had a good case… I read in the details of the agreement between the BE and WVCC that WVCC was obligated to provide assistance to Pitt and Syracuse in filling the hole caused by their departure… according to what I read Pitt and Syracuse had to ask by 2/15 and Pitt states it has not been made aware of the details of the agreement, thereby missing the deadline to request such assistance… I believe that condition in the settlement was put in there to try and negate what I said previously was what Pitt was going to use as its out… I believe the conference knew that and also recognized it was likely a legitimate claim… I don’t think either the BE or WVCC intended Pitt or Syracuse to be able to require WVCC to provide assistance, hence the extremely short window of opportunity date wise… I believe Pitt still plans on using this as a means to leave in time for next season… I believe that is why today the ACC released the following statement:
We at the Atlantic Coast Conference realize that there’s tremendous anticipation for the release of the 2012 ACC Football schedule. The conference office and member institutions are equally in anticipation and are taking steps to expedite finding appropriate solutions. As has been documented, there are a number of unusual circumstances beyond the control of the ACC and its member schools that have directly impacted a number of our school’s nonconference schedules, which in turn effects the development and completion of the overall schedule. Please know that all parties are working diligently and we appreciate everyone’s continued patience.
What do you think of that? Too much of a stretch?
by ruggerjohnnyd on Feb 16, 2026 6:53 PM EST reply actions
Personally
I wouldn’t read too much into that statement. I think the ACC and Pitt would both like it if Pitt could get out this time (and the ACC may even be holding out hope that it actually happens), but I don’t see any way that the Big East lets this happen without a major fight. Teams are already scrambling to fill schedules and losing two more programs would be disastrous for 2012.
Just how I see it.
Manager of Cardiac Hill - SB Nation's Pitt Panthers blog
Follow us on Facebook at CardiacHill and on Twitter at @PittPantherBlog
by CardiacHill on Feb 16, 2026 8:16 PM EST up reply actions
The big problem
seems to be the year 2014. The 2013 season should be OK if they enter the Big East that year, because NC State and V Tech would just turn into conference games, and then you have your 3 non-conference games as Navy, ND, and Nova.
However, in 2014, none of those 5 non-conference games are ACC teams, and with the 9 game ACC schedule, you can only have 3 non-conference games. That means they would be forced to ditch 2 of those teams. I can’t imagine them dropping Iowa, and I believe they have a contractual commitment with FIU (and obviously not dropping ND), so it will probably be Delaware and Akron that they drop.
Wow, this just highlights how little flexibility a 9 game conference schedule gives you.
by PittGuy on Mar 1, 2026 4:36 PM EST reply actions

by oaklandzoo12 on 










