Pitt Vs. West Virginia - Panthers Well Short Of Mountaineers?
Color me confused, but I really don't get all the love for West Virginia's basketball team in comparison with Pitt's when it comes to perception this season. Now, I get that Pitt had a horrific run of eight straight losses, but it's pretty clear to anyone with a pulse that the Panthers are a completely different team with a healthy Tray Woodall.
Apparently, though, West Virginia is still looking like a solid NCAA tournament team while Pitt is fighting to even get onto the bubble ... and I don't get it.
Fact: Pitt and West Virginia have virtually identical records - Pitt is 15-9 and West Virginia is 16-8.
Fact: Pitt has played to a nearly identical record missing a key player for half the season while the Mountaineers have been mostly healthy
Fact: Pitt beat West Virginia ... in West Virginia
Fact: Both teams have only one ranked win (over Georgetown)
Fact: Pitt is 4-0 in their past four games while West Virginia is 1-3
Now, the huge difference is in the RPI where West Virginia is 30th, while Pitt is 61st (as of Monday), so I can understand how West Virginia gets a slight nod over Pitt. But given all of the above, I have a hard time saying WVU is head and shoulders better than Pitt - especially with Woodall back.
I mentioned earlier this week that I was curious to see where Pitt came out in Joe Lunardi's recent Bracketology. Those rankings came out on Monday and there's still a huge difference between the two according ESPN's resident bracketologist.
Despite West Virginia losing three of their past four games, Lunardi has the Mountaineers as an eight seed in his most recent bracket. Meanwhile, Pitt's nowhere to be found - not even as one of his last eight teams out.
Now, I've got less of a problem with Pitt not being in than I do with the large disparity between the two in the rankings.
Those facts I listed weren't to claim that West Virginia isn't a good team. It's quite possible they're still a better team than post-Woodall Pitt. They were merely to show that the two are pretty even in my mind. If West Virginia is a tournament team, then so is Pitt. Unfortunately, that logic isn't playing out apparently.
All of this will probably come out in the wash, but I'm still a little confused by some of Lunardi's logic.
Be sure to join Cardiac Hill's Facebook page and follow us on Twitter @PittPantherBlog for our regular updates on Pitt football and basketball.
Panthers Fan Confidence Poll
Last tallied on 02/08.
2 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It makes sense
We lost to Cincinatti, Notre Dame and Louisville. We beat West Virginia. As compared to the other big east bubble teams, we are 1-3, with games left against WVU and Seton Hall. If we win those games, we’ll be more favorably considered when it comes to bracketology, likely as the highest of those Bubble teams since Woodall was out for every loss except ND
Bees Bees Everywhere
by VoteforPedro on Feb 8, 2026 2:01 PM EST reply actions
I can understand your logic
And if Pitt is behind those teams, I get it. Just not sure that WVU is as high as an 8-seed while Pitt isn’t even theoretically an 18-seed according to his last eight out. I don’t know if the difference is that great.
Part of it, obviously, is automatic bids tying up 12/13 - 16 seeds, but still seems like a big difference.
That said, with the USF loss tonight, it’s probably about right as we now stand.
Manager of Cardiac Hill - SB Nation's Pitt Panthers blog
Follow us on Facebook at CardiacHill and on Twitter at @PittPantherBlog
by CardiacHill on Feb 8, 2026 10:19 PM EST up reply actions

by CardiacHill on 









