Final Rutgers Analysis
by CardiacHill on Oct 15, 2025 9:04 PM EDT
Tweet
Email
Print
So it's the day before the Rutgers game. All week, there's been talk about important topics in the media...the play of Rutgers freshman Tom Savage, Pitt running back Dion Lewis...Sweet Caroline.
Seriously, though. My feelings have been already discussed about this dopey song. But I don't know how anyone could attribute this song to Pitt's comeback win this past weekend. Sure, the fans may enjoy it. But I have a hard time believing Pitt's defense was even slightly motivated to play better because of it. And if they were, then there's a serious coaching issue. Over/under on the number of games Pitt plays until they bring Neil in to sing it live? I'll go with ten, saying it will happen sometime next year.
I wouldn't place too much stock in Rutgers' rushing defense since the only time they've played a quality team (Cincinnati), they gave up 160+ yards. Pitt also did just fine against another good defense last week in UCONN. If the flow of the game doesn't dictate that Pitt needs to throw every down to catch up, I would expect the running game to do well as they have all season. I will say this though - I don't think Lewis and Graham will run absolutely roughshod as they have most of this season.
Pitt's passing game could also be facing the most pressure they've faced all season. This is where more of my concern lies. Stull has been able to play the role of an actual quarterback this year and not just a game manager. But with the different defensive looks Rutgers is sure to provide, I'd quite honestly take a lesser, but mistake-free game from him. The offensive line is really going to have to be on their game as well as the running backs/fullbacks that will need to pick up rushers in passing situations where they're staying at home.
Oh, and if there wasn't enough to worry about, there's that embarrassing game from last year where the secondary was torched. Yes, Rutgers is playing with a freshman quarterback. But he looks to be a good one and is yet to throw an interception all year. That, friends, is how you win games - mistake-free football.
Make no mistake, though. Even though the stories this week have understandably focused on what Rutgers can do, Pitt can do a few things of its own. For starters, Dion Lewis is only 8 yards away from being the top rusher in all of college football. Jonathan Baldwin, if he gets the chance, can play like one of the top wide receivers in the country. And Bill Stull has one of the top five passer ratings in the country. Oh yeah, the defense (at least the front four and linebackers) can play pretty well, too. Pitt's keys to win are simple if you ask me:
1. Offensive line, offensive line, offensive line. If they block well as they have all season, and Bill Stull has time, his mistakes have been limited. And if they force Rutgers to respect the pass, the running game will have an honest chance.
2. Get Baldwin the ball. This goes with #1. Again, as last week, I think Pitt needs to take its shots deep if only for the fact that Baldwin and Dickerson have shown they can come up with the ball more times than not if the throw is accurate.
3. Get Rutgers QB Tom Savage to make bad plays. This may seem difficult because he's been so poised thus far. But if Pitt can get a turnover or two, it will go a long way.
4. Keep the defense off of the field. The defense has looked tired at points when Pitt's offense has stalled this season. Pitt needs to sustain drives (even if they don't score) and get the defense some rest.
5. Score touchdowns, not field goals. No TDs on four trips inside the ten as they had last week is not good enough. Yes, I know the last drive was more about running out the clock, but you get the point. You've got to punch it in and capitalize.
Now, I really don't want to make a prediction here...mostly for the fact that I hate picking against Pitt and I think there's a strong chance they could lose this game if they turn the ball over. But I'm also encouraged by the fact that Pitt has already experienced a Friday night game on the road this year.
Brian Bennett and ESPN.com calls for a narrow Pitt win, so I will too. I got Pitt's total of 24 points right last weekend - here's the call:
Pitt 27 - Rutgers 20
Seriously, though. My feelings have been already discussed about this dopey song. But I don't know how anyone could attribute this song to Pitt's comeback win this past weekend. Sure, the fans may enjoy it. But I have a hard time believing Pitt's defense was even slightly motivated to play better because of it. And if they were, then there's a serious coaching issue. Over/under on the number of games Pitt plays until they bring Neil in to sing it live? I'll go with ten, saying it will happen sometime next year.
I wouldn't place too much stock in Rutgers' rushing defense since the only time they've played a quality team (Cincinnati), they gave up 160+ yards. Pitt also did just fine against another good defense last week in UCONN. If the flow of the game doesn't dictate that Pitt needs to throw every down to catch up, I would expect the running game to do well as they have all season. I will say this though - I don't think Lewis and Graham will run absolutely roughshod as they have most of this season.
Pitt's passing game could also be facing the most pressure they've faced all season. This is where more of my concern lies. Stull has been able to play the role of an actual quarterback this year and not just a game manager. But with the different defensive looks Rutgers is sure to provide, I'd quite honestly take a lesser, but mistake-free game from him. The offensive line is really going to have to be on their game as well as the running backs/fullbacks that will need to pick up rushers in passing situations where they're staying at home.
Oh, and if there wasn't enough to worry about, there's that embarrassing game from last year where the secondary was torched. Yes, Rutgers is playing with a freshman quarterback. But he looks to be a good one and is yet to throw an interception all year. That, friends, is how you win games - mistake-free football.
Make no mistake, though. Even though the stories this week have understandably focused on what Rutgers can do, Pitt can do a few things of its own. For starters, Dion Lewis is only 8 yards away from being the top rusher in all of college football. Jonathan Baldwin, if he gets the chance, can play like one of the top wide receivers in the country. And Bill Stull has one of the top five passer ratings in the country. Oh yeah, the defense (at least the front four and linebackers) can play pretty well, too. Pitt's keys to win are simple if you ask me:
1. Offensive line, offensive line, offensive line. If they block well as they have all season, and Bill Stull has time, his mistakes have been limited. And if they force Rutgers to respect the pass, the running game will have an honest chance.
2. Get Baldwin the ball. This goes with #1. Again, as last week, I think Pitt needs to take its shots deep if only for the fact that Baldwin and Dickerson have shown they can come up with the ball more times than not if the throw is accurate.
3. Get Rutgers QB Tom Savage to make bad plays. This may seem difficult because he's been so poised thus far. But if Pitt can get a turnover or two, it will go a long way.
4. Keep the defense off of the field. The defense has looked tired at points when Pitt's offense has stalled this season. Pitt needs to sustain drives (even if they don't score) and get the defense some rest.
5. Score touchdowns, not field goals. No TDs on four trips inside the ten as they had last week is not good enough. Yes, I know the last drive was more about running out the clock, but you get the point. You've got to punch it in and capitalize.
Now, I really don't want to make a prediction here...mostly for the fact that I hate picking against Pitt and I think there's a strong chance they could lose this game if they turn the ball over. But I'm also encouraged by the fact that Pitt has already experienced a Friday night game on the road this year.
Brian Bennett and ESPN.com calls for a narrow Pitt win, so I will too. I got Pitt's total of 24 points right last weekend - here's the call:
Pitt 27 - Rutgers 20
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm of two minds about that decision by DW to go for the FG at the two yard line when down 14-3 last week. On one hand I (and every other fan) wanted 7 points there. A sure three points that early in the game is pretty lucrative though.
On the second, late game, goal line series I think DW did exactly the right things - superb clock management and setting up a chip shot FG for the win. One point would have won the game there - so there was no benefit at all to try for the TD instead of the FG.
On the second, late game, goal line series I think DW did exactly the right things - superb clock management and setting up a chip shot FG for the win. One point would have won the game there - so there was no benefit at all to try for the TD instead of the FG.
by rkohberger on Oct 16, 2025 4:47 AM EDT reply actions
I'm terrified that Pitt's going to screw this up and drop a game that they shouldn't. Beating UCONN was a step in the right direction, but I really want see if we can make it to the ND game at 8-1.
by 8thlight on Oct 16, 2025 11:55 AM EDT reply actions
rkohberger - Yeah, I just hope we can get in the end zone tonight. Both defenses should be hyped up on a Friday night and points may be at a premium.
8th - The reason you're terrified is because this is what Pitt has done in the past - drop innumerable games they shouldn't really lose. Now, they also win some they probably shouldn't, but they've seen their share of bad losses. I don't think this would necessarily be a bad loss as Rutgers is pretty good. But it's a game they're more than capable of winning. I'm a bit unsure as well and wouldn't be surprised to see it end up either way, though. Rutgers is very solid.
8th - The reason you're terrified is because this is what Pitt has done in the past - drop innumerable games they shouldn't really lose. Now, they also win some they probably shouldn't, but they've seen their share of bad losses. I don't think this would necessarily be a bad loss as Rutgers is pretty good. But it's a game they're more than capable of winning. I'm a bit unsure as well and wouldn't be surprised to see it end up either way, though. Rutgers is very solid.
by Lee on Oct 16, 2025 12:26 PM EDT reply actions
8th - 8-1 would be very nice to meet ND with. Although I'm of the mind that the ND game - while great to win - isn't as important as the BE games... meaning that if we have kids dinged up I'd like to see them on the bench to heal for the next BE match. I'm sure most fans don't feel that way.
Funny - some fans are thinking this will be a low scoring game and others are thinking it will be an offensive shootout. I think if PITT puts together a 'full game' we are going to be hard to beat. Not an original thought by any means as it's been said all week.
What is the origin of your screen name - it's interesting.
Funny - some fans are thinking this will be a low scoring game and others are thinking it will be an offensive shootout. I think if PITT puts together a 'full game' we are going to be hard to beat. Not an original thought by any means as it's been said all week.
What is the origin of your screen name - it's interesting.
by rkohberger on Oct 16, 2025 5:09 PM EDT reply actions
This looks like a mirror image of the UCONN first half - outplaying the other team, but the scoreboard not indicative of it.
by Lee on Oct 16, 2025 9:38 PM EDT reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Pittsburgh Panthers.
- Start posting about the Panthers
- Follow @PittPantherBlog
- Follow Cardiac Hill on your iPhone!
- Subscribe to Cardiac Hill Stories
Latest NCAAF Headlines From SB Nation
Five Questions About Bowling Green
September 12th Jump Off
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2011 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
