Pitt Vs. Villanova: Panthers Beat The Odds. Again.
I said earlier this week that if Pitt can defeat Villanova, it was completely different than beating Cincinnati or West Virginia as they did despite recent losses of Ashton Gibbs, Dante Taylor, and Lamar Patterson. Well, on Saturday they did just that.
Road game in a building where no road team has won in 46 tries? No problem.
Do it without your best player? Okay.
Against a top ten team? No worries.
Pitt always seems to have an answer and its win over Villanova on Saturday proved that yet again.
By now, this is what we've come to expect from Pitt. Have their backs against the wall and still come out punching their next opponent square in the mouth. You could easily argue that Villanova was the more physical team and yet Pitt adjusted and played smarter...better.
Still, one thing is certain - Pitt misses Ashton Gibbs.
The offense again plodded through a dismal first half where they tied their season low with only 23 points. That season low was set, by the way, against West Virginia in its last game.
Also without Gibbs.
The offense just looks so different and really makes you appreciate Gibbs so much more. Still, guys did step up. Particularly, the Philadelphia guys - Brad Wanamaker and Nasir Robinson. They combined for 36 points and really carried Pitt at times in this game.
Ichiro, one of the best hitters in baseball, isn't known as a power hitter. But if you ask any of his teammates that watch him in batting practice, they say he regularly puts balls over the wall. Why doesn't he do it in a game? He doesn't necessarily need to in order to be effective and his average would drop. Nas reminds me of him in a bit. You don't really think of him as a great scorer, but he can do it if he needs to. Before the West Virginia game, he averaged only about eight points per game. But in the past two with Gibbs out, he's had 15 in each contest. He slashes to the basket, he hustles - he's just a heck of a player.
Wanamaker scored 21 against Nova, but his great night was almost forgotten with a terrible turnover in the last 30 seconds, giving the Wildcats a chance to tie the game with a three. Still, he had a good game and played really well.
The area that Pitt really faltered was in its physicality. You see them occasionally lose the rebounding battle, but by 12 (33-21)? That's basically unheard of. Villanova really beat Pitt to the boards several times and had the Panthers lost the game, that would have been the main reason why. As I mentioned over on the SB Nation Pittsburgh recap, Nova big man Mouphtaou Yarou seemed like he was pushing off on nearly every rebound. Still, Pitt's got to rebound better than that and giving up 12 offensive rebounds just isn't like them.
Nova will be a tough out in the tournament. They've got great guard play and are much more physical than I thought.
That said, thuggery was at a high level when Isaiah Armwood literally punched Nasir Robinson in the face. Now, if you didn't see the play, I preface that statement by saying it wasn't an all-out wind-up punch, but he literally had a closed fist and hit Nasir in the face. He then deftly wrapped his arm around a player who was in front of Nas, but it clearly looked intentional. Somewhat surprisingly, he was only whistled for a technical and not thrown out.
Somehow, I've got to think that if a Pitt player did that, they'd have been thrown out just because of the reputation of the team as being tough. The play was completely uncalled for and I'm still stunned that he didn't get the boot.
The end was so fitting as Nova hit a three, but it came just after the buzzer. I couldn't help but think 'almost, but not enough.' Pitt may be bound for another early tournament exit. They may not accomplish everything they want. I've said it before - the NCAAs are a crapshoot. You just need everything to go your way and the best team doesn't always win.
But on this night, Pitt showed the rest of the Big East they're still on top.
Panthers Fan Confidence Poll
Last tallied on 02/09.
Tweet
5 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Defense
Great job on the defensive end against the guards of Nova. I thought Pitt has really improved their pick and roll defense over the season. I took a look at how they are doing it. Hope you enjoy.
by JoshuaR on Feb 13, 2026 9:27 AM EST reply actions
someone please tell me
why does Pitt get hardly any credit for winning games. OSU has beaten 2-top 25 teams and lost their first game to a tough Wisconsin team at home. Kansas has only beaten 2-top 25 teams and lost by 4 points AT HOME to Texas. Texas has three losses, two solid ones to Pitt(neutral) and UConn(AT HOME) and a 17 point loss to South Carolina(???) paired with 3 wins against ranked teams(albeit two of those at UNC and Kansas.
Pitt on the other hand, has a current record of 23-2. The two losses were on a neutral court to an at the time ranked Scotty Hopson(not Tennesse, Scotty Hopson) and currently ranked Notre Dame at home in maybe the most boring game in history. WIth those two losses come 7!! wins against ranked opponents including Texas. How is it that they get no respect nationally and will probably not even receive a single vote for the number one spot. I am not saying they should be number one, but still considered. If I were to build a top 5 they would go as follows:
1. Kansas
2. Pitt
3. Osu
4. Texas
5. Duke
I know this was typed in a very odd manor, but in order to get my point across it had to be stressed in some places.
by Colti on Feb 13, 2026 6:22 PM EST reply actions
To be honest
I think Pitt has been getting a fair amount of respect this year. They’ve been ranked higher than Duke, while they have the same number of losses…that’s progress.
But you’re right about Texas. The only reason I think they’ve been ranked ahead of Pitt is because they’ve been on a role lately and they had a huge win over No. 1 Kansas on the road. But looking at the whole body of work, Pitt should be ahead of them - one fewer loss and a head-to-head win at neutral site.
Personally, I think when it comes time for seeding, you’ll see Pitt seeded higher (assuming they keep winning). The selection committee should take a closer look at things than the poll voters do.
I’d also agree with your top five, but I think Pitt will end up no better than 3rd unfortunately. And they may still be fourth because OSU only has one loss.
by CardiacHill on Feb 13, 2026 6:56 PM EST up reply actions
I agree
I just think that when it comes time to put the votes in, the reporters or coaches are thinking about where to put teams and look at the previous week’s poll and say "Oh my goodness look how big the names are here: Kansas, Texas, Ohio State….and that Pitt team that seems to keep winning. Hmm well i guess we cant throw “Pitt” out of the top 5 it will be much too obvious that we don’t pay attention to them. Hmmm lets just put them here" rather than actually looking at their resume.
Come tournament time, we have always gotten our seeding that we deserve and I guess that is really what counts. It would just be nice to be considered an elite team after proving our program year after year. The Big East gets its notoriety for being arguably the toughest conference in the nation, but its best team(according to record) doesn’t seem to get rewarded for it.
by Colti on Feb 13, 2026 7:24 PM EST up reply actions
At least baskeball has a great system where the champion earns it on the court. I believe Pitt should be ranked ahead of Texas, but it really does not matter in March. If basketball had the same system as football, we could be on the outside looking in for a championship game.
Bring on March!! H2P
by Jaranosh on Feb 13, 2026 7:04 PM EST reply actions

by CardiacHill on 




