Thoughts on Pitt Hoops
Thoughts on Pitt from Reader SlicenDice112 (Write your own Fanpost over to the right)
If Jamie Dixon doesn’t switch it up on both offense and defense, Pitt is in trouble this year. What has made Pitt so good throughout the years is the fact that they don’t need to score 80 points to be in a game. They would hold teams to the 60 point range through solid defense and dominating the glass. In order for Pitt to get a top 3 seed in the NCAA tournament this year, I think they need to make the following changes:
Defense: Their starting lineup right now is 4 guys under 6’6" and no Dejuan Blair, Aaron Gray or Gary Mcghee underneath to compensate. Since we don’t have a monster in the middle this year, we need more size to be more effective on defense and dominate the glass. We can’t start Travon Woodall at the 1 and Nasir Robinson at the 4, that’s way too small. We need to start Talib Zanna (or maybe Malcolm Gilbert – I haven’t really seen him but hear good things) at the 5, move Dante Taylor to the 4, Robinson to the 3 and Lamar Patterson to the 2, to give us more size and rebounding. Bring Woodall off the bench. Is this our best offensive team, no, but we have the size and quickness to lockdown on defense and control the boards. Plus bringing Woodall off the bench will give us a veteran spark to complement/spell Gibbs. Last year, Robinson could start at the 4 because you had Mcghee at center, Gilbert Brown (6’6") at small forward and Brad Wannamaker (6’4") at the 2. Brown and Wannamaker were insane athletes, something Patterson and Gibbs aren’t.
Offense: A byproduct of the above lineup will be less threes and more quality possessions. Ashton Gibbs is one of the best players in the country. But that doesn’t mean that the best possession is throwing one pass to Gibbs off that down screen and letting him create his own shot, or pass it around the perimeter with Woodall. Even if it does go in, it takes everyone else out of the game, doesn’t make the other team work on defense, doesn’t draw fouls and leads to long rebounds if they miss. The motion offense Pitt has run for years, gets everyone a touch, makes the other team play defense and we still get a great look at the end. By making Ashton bring up the ball as opposed to Woodall, we are forcing him to initiate the offense and then get the ball back only after it goes through the progression. Additionally, give Taylor the ball in the post. We need to develop a post game or at least have people respect it. Whether or not he is going to live up to his Mcdonalds reputation, at least give him a chance. We don’t even look to get the ball in the post and it’s only a matter of time before he becomes totally uninterested on the other end. If you feed this dude and show him that you trust him to kick it back out or take it to the rack, his energy on the other end will rise.
We have a ton of talent and we are young, but it would be unfortunate if we end up being that team that starts off in the top 10 and goes to the NIT. Gibbs is great, but great players aren’t what got us to where we are. Good players playing as a great team. Now we have great players who need to play the same way, and we could go extremely far.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My argument for "no" is pretty basic
1) Woodall has shown good things and 2) Gibbs is a great shooter, but isn’t great at creating his own shot
You may disagree with #2, or say that it isn’t a big deal since everyone touches the ball at the top of the key in Pitt’s half court offense anyway. But tournament time last year, best example being Butler, really proved it matters. If Woodall can concern teams with his shot and ability to penetrate the lane and garner attention, Pitt may be able to beat a hot team late in the tourney this year.
I think they could add a little size by keeping Taylor and Zanna on the floor together more. That way Patterson can give any of the starters a blow at any time with a minimal shuffle of the line up.
by DITO on Nov 22, 2025 1:36 PM EST reply actions
Good point
I agree, but my point is, we’ve been successful over the years by putting defense/rebounding before offense. I definitely think Woodall should play a lot and even together with Gibbs, what I’m suggesting is as evidenced by Long Beach State, we don’t have the firepower to keep up with a team that gets hot. Controlling the boards and locking down on defense need to be our #1 priority, and then bring a more experienced and athletic group off of the bench. Who do we bring off the bench now that worries anyone? No one. By bringing Woodall off of the bench, I think will make other bench players better, and improve our defense and rebounding overall.
by slicendice112 on Nov 22, 2025 2:49 PM EST up reply actions
Watching the Memphis-Tennessee game today
Tennessee’s bigs are strong inside. A.K.A. they’re gonna tear Dante to pieces if he doesn’t toughen up.
Side story, former Pitt player Dwight Miller currently plays for the Vols. Has 4 points and 2 rebounds against the Tigers
Cardiac Hill contributor
by oaklandzoo12 on Nov 22, 2025 3:37 PM EST up reply actions
Good points
But I don’t like all those guys out of position. Nas has played the 4 effectively, Gibbs is better at the 2 (in my opinion), and starting Gilbert or Zanna merely to get a taller player in there is probably not the way to go.
I see your point, but you can’t sit a superior player like Woodall (who’s been one of Pitt’s best players this season) down in favor of either of those two players. If Birch steps up, like he did tonight, I could you see your point a little better if he were the one to start, but still not thrilled with moving Nas and Ashton at this point.
Too early in the season to make major switches like this.
And agreed on looking into the paint. For a team that gets as many assists as Pitt does, I’m surprised there are so few times they pound the ball in low.
Manager of Cardiac Hill - SB Nation's Pitt Panthers blog
Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter at @PittPantherBlog
by CardiacHill on Nov 22, 2025 10:30 PM EST reply actions
Good points...
I didn’t see the game tonight. Wasn’t on TV where I am. Nas has played effectively, but I think could be a bigger mismatch at the 3. I don’t know any 3’s who can guard him in the post. I do hear your point though and the solution might be starting Patterson and Moore. Even though Woodall is playing great, I think he has to come off the bench. Gibbs should start at the 1. Definitely early in the season, but I have never seen Pitt struggle like this so early.
by slicendice112 on Nov 22, 2025 10:40 PM EST up reply actions

by slicendice112 on 









